USPTO serial 79337901
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Communication software; computer software; communications processing computer software; computer software applications (downloadable); data communications software; data processing software; speech recognition software; voice recognition software; speech to text conversion software; voice-enabled software applications; data feeders for use with artificial intelligence; data feeders linked with artificial intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services; communication services for the electronic transmission of voices; electronic transmission of voices; voice mail services; voice message retrieval services; voice message storage services; voice over internet protocol (voip) services; voice transmission services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software; design, development and maintenance of proprietary computer software in the field of natural language, speech, speaker, language, voice recognition and voice-print recognition; platform as a services (paas); design and development of native cloud based call recording solutions; design and development of saas based call recording solutions; design and development of subscription based call recording solutions; design and development of telecommunications carrier call recording solutions; design and development of hosted call recording solutions; design and development of scalable call recording solutions; design and development of secure call recording solutions; design and development of cloud based call recording solutions presenting features such as sharing, searching, filtering, security, metadata, permissions, centralisation, taggable; design and development of analytics based call recording solutions; design and development of biometrics based call recording solutions; design and development of sentiment analysis based call recording solutions; design and development of open api based call recording solutions; hosting of software as a service (saas); software as a service (saas); providing search engines for obtaining data via the internet and other electronic communications networks; provision of online non-downloadable software (application service provider); provision of online non-downloadable web-based software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2023 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |