Drawing for CUTOP

USPTO serial 79338453

CUTOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCNAMARA, SHANA MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUTOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Finishing machines; stropping machines; machines and apparatus for polishing [electric]; millstones; grindstones [parts of machines]; screw thread process knife; fretsaw slice; grindstones [part of machines]; sharpening machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 26, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 23, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 20, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 20, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 20, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 14, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 13, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 15, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2022SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance