USPTO serial 79338525
M CLOUDMIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with M CLOUDMIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley D. Crose
Bradley D. Crose Crose Law LLC112 Northbrooke TraceWoodstock, GA 30188UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Streaming of data | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, live performances by musical bands; Entertainment services in the nature of live musical, band performances; Entertainment services, namely, providing music tours in the nature of live musical performances; production of live musical performances; production services, namely, producing live shows in the nature of musical performances, band performances, musical competitions, concerts, sports, football, rugby, cricket; Organisation of live musical performances, band performances, musical competitions, concerts, shows for entertainment purposes; Presentation of live musical, band performances and sports, football, rugby, cricket competitions; Production of live entertainment, namely, musical performances, band performances, musical competitions, concerts; Entertainment services, namely, production of live musical, band performances; Providing live entertainment in the nature of musical performances, band performances, musical competitions, concerts, sports, football, rugby, cricket | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing virtual computer systems through cloud computing; hosting computer web sites; hosting of digital content on the internet, namely, databases with information about artists; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for providing live streams, musical performances, and sports competitions, and for mixing, routing, monitoring, switching of live streams, musical performances, and sports competitions; Designing and hosting web portals for others; Hosting of online calculators; Hosting of web sites, namely, websites featuring blogs; internet portal services, namely, design and hosting of internet portals for others; server hosting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |