Drawing for TRANSCENDENTAL CONNECTION

USPTO serial 79338839

TRANSCENDENTAL CONNECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GANESH, HARINI
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TRANSCENDENTAL CONNECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NICHOLAS D WELLS

NICHOLAS D WELLS LEGENDS LAW GROUP PLLC330 MAIN STKAYSVILLE, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Coaching in the field of personal wellness and self development; education services, namely, seminars in the fields of personal wellness and self development; provision of educational information about seminars and classes on personal wellness and self developmentABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2023MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 26, 2023ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 26, 2023OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 26, 2023OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 8, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 23, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 25, 2023OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 25, 2023GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2023OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2023OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Apr 21, 2023OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 11, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2023OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 17, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 16, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 2, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2022LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance