USPTO serial 79339224
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hun Joon Kim
Hun Joon Kim LEX IP Meister, PLLC.5160 Parkstone Drive, Suite 140Chantilly, VA 20151UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Mask pack for cosmetic purposes; face and body creams; cosmetic creams and lotions for face and body care; beauty soap; skin toners; facial moisturisers; hair moisturizers; moisturizing cream; functional cosmetics being skin care preparations; shampoos; exfoliant cosmetics; cosmetics; hair shampoo; non-medicated toiletry preparations; cosmetic oils for the epidermis; facial cleansers; skin cleansers; facial concealer; body wash; beauty serums | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |