Drawing for VOLLGAS

USPTO serial 79339289

VOLLGAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NIELSON, TARA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VOLLGAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly N. Fisher

Kimberly N. Fisher Kolitch Romano Dascenzo Gates LLC621 SW Morrison Street #1100Portland, OR 97205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Lemonades; non-alcoholic essences for making non-alcoholic beverages, not in the nature of essential oils; seltzer water; aerated water; carbonated water; kvass; protein-enriched sports beverages; energy drinks; syrups for making non-alcoholic fruit-flavored beverages; preparations for making non-alcoholic carbonated water beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2025FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2025FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2025FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 5, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 21, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 4, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 31, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 10, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 9, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 29, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance