USPTO serial 79339295
NAVAT I ANJI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORNWELL, ANDREA B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NAVAT I ANJI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing apparatus; computer memory devices; computer programs, recorded; computer software, recorded; computer programs, downloadable; computer software platforms, recorded or downloadable; mobile phone software applications, downloadable; computer operating programs, recorded; computer hardware; computers; navigational instruments; radar apparatus; global positioning system [GPS] apparatus; laser direction instrument; distance measuring apparatus; steering apparatus, automatic, for vehicles; simulators for the steering and control of vehicles; laboratory robots; precision measuring apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Freighting; transport brokerage; transportation logistics; hauling; car transport; vehicle breakdown towing services; chauffeur services; vehicle rental; storage of goods; delivery of goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Conducting technical project studies; mechanical research; research and development of new products for others; technological research; vehicle roadworthiness testing; test services for machine function; computer programming; computer system design; computer software design; monitoring of computer systems by remote access; electronic data storage; providing search engines for the internet; data encryption services; platform as a service [PaaS]; development of computer platforms; computer system analysis; off-site data backup; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2023 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |