USPTO serial 79339422
RP TECHNIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RP TECHNIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leesa N. Weiss
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal building materials, in particular profiles, pipes and metallic sheets; building materials made in combination of metal and non-metal, in particular profiles, pipes and tubes, panels; framework or skeleton constructions made from metal for the mounting of facade construction systems on buildings with doors, windows, hatches or fixed panes/or panels as well as accessory parts in the form of hinges, fittings and cover profiles; outdoor fences and building walls, in particular fire protection walls made of metal for the use within buildings with doors, windows or hatches | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Building materials (non-metallic), in particular profiles, pipes and tubes, panels of plastic, wood, glass or stone; framework or skeleton constructions made from non-metal for the mounting of facade construction systems on buildings with doors, windows, hatches or fixed panes/or panels as well as accessory parts in the form of hinges, fittings and cover profiles; outdoor fences and building walls, in particular fire protection walls made of non-metal for the use within buildings with doors, windows or hatches | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 7, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |