USPTO serial 79339533
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Nano-cellulose pulp; nano-cellulose paste; unprocessed synthetic resins consisting primarily of nano-cellulose; cellulose pulp; cellulose paste; unprocessed synthetic resins consisting primarily of cellulose; nano-cellulose paste for absorbing human fecal; cellulose paste for absorbing human fecal | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Diaper liners; incontinence pads made of nano-cellulose; diapers made of cellulose; incontinence pads made of cellulose; disposable diapers made of cellulose; absorbent diapers of nano-cellulose for pets; absorbent diapers of cellulose for pets; sanitary tampons made of nano-cellulose for female hygiene; sanitary pads made of nano-cellulose for female hygiene; sanitary pads made of cellulose forfemale hygiene; sanitary tampons made of cellulose for female hygiene; diapers for incontinence made of cellulose; disposable diapers for incontinence made of cellulose; baby diapers made of cellulose; disposable baby diapers made of cellulose; diapers made of nano-cellulose for medical purposes; diapers made of cellulose for medical purposes; inserts made of cloth specially adapted for reusable babies' diapers; inserts made of microfibre specially adapted for reusable babies' diapers | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Wrapping paper for storage of fruits or vegetables; hygienic paper consisting primarily of nano-cellulose; paper handtowels consisting primarily of nano-cellulose; absorbent sheets of paper or plastic for storage meat or fish consisting primarily of nano-cellulose; wrapping paper for storage of fruits or vegetables consisting primarily of nano-cellulose; paper tissues for pets consisting primarily of nano-cellulose; paper tissues for babies consisting primarily of nano-cellulose; absorbent sheets of paper or plastic for storage of meat or fish; food wrapping paper; paper tissues for pets; hygienic paper; paper tissues for babies; paper napkins; kitchen rolls of paper; paper handtowels; paper tissues; tissues of paper for cosmetic use | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |