USPTO serial 79339605
Q PARTEC MODULAR SUPERCOMPUTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PULVERMACHER, TASHA NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Q PARTEC MODULAR SUPERCOMPUTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; data processing terminals; electrical and electronic components; computers; computer servers; computer software; data processing computers; data entry terminals; data terminals; data processing equipment; computer programmes for data processing; apparatus for the transmission of data; apparatus for the transmission of data; data storage devices; data storage media; software | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware; installation of computers; installation of computer hardware; installation and maintenance of hardware for cluster networks and of hardware for grid computing networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Provision of instruction relating to computer programming; training services in the field of computer software development; training relating to computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultancy and advice in the design and development of computer hardware and software; computer programming; it consultancy, advisory and information services; computer system analysis; development and testing of computing methods, algorithms and software; design and development of electronic database software; design and development of computer programs for data processing; troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; remote server administration; research relating to data processing; research in the field of information technology; research in the field of data processing technology; maintenance of data processing software; maintenance of computer software; writing of computer programs; computer system design; cloud computing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2024 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |