Drawing for DIEMAKERS' ORIGINALS

USPTO serial 79340235

DIEMAKERS' ORIGINALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PULVERMACHER, TASHA NICOLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIEMAKERS' ORIGINALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE R. REPPER

GEORGE R. REPPER ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC901 NEW YORK AVENUE NWSUITE 900 EASTWASHINGTON, DC 20001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for the production of punching dies and parts therefor; machines for the production of packaging materials and parts therefor; mechanical stamping tools [machines] and parts therefor; mechanical punching tools [machines] and parts therefor; mechanical stripping tools [machines] and parts therefor; mechanical blanking tools [machines] and parts therefor; parts especially adapted for the aforementioned machines and tools, namely, counter plates, hammers, forks, die boards, cutting rules, creasing rules, perforation rules, rubbers, nuts, speed mounts, screws, reinforcements, perfatypes, mounting rails, handles, washers, pushers, foam cubes, spacers, stripping claws, joggers, pressers, spring units, sheet lifters, tool protectors; preparations sheets, make-ready strips and crease-preparing devices being tools for use with stamping, punching, stripping and blanking tools and machines (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations)ACTIVE—
009Measuring apparatus and instrumentsACTIVE—
017Goods of rubber, gutta-percha or gum being parts of stamping, punching, stripping and blanking tools and machines (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); materials for rubber coating of punching dies (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); adhesive tapes, strips, bands and films (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2025FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 12, 2025FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2025FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2024MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 12, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 11, 2024ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 2, 2024EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 22, 2024EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 22, 2024EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 6, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 18, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 23, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 28, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 27, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 13, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 12, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance