USPTO serial 79340235
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE R. REPPER
GEORGE R. REPPER ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC901 NEW YORK AVENUE NWSUITE 900 EASTWASHINGTON, DC 20001| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for the production of punching dies and parts therefor; machines for the production of packaging materials and parts therefor; mechanical stamping tools [machines] and parts therefor; mechanical punching tools [machines] and parts therefor; mechanical stripping tools [machines] and parts therefor; mechanical blanking tools [machines] and parts therefor; parts especially adapted for the aforementioned machines and tools, namely, counter plates, hammers, forks, die boards, cutting rules, creasing rules, perforation rules, rubbers, nuts, speed mounts, screws, reinforcements, perfatypes, mounting rails, handles, washers, pushers, foam cubes, spacers, stripping claws, joggers, pressers, spring units, sheet lifters, tool protectors; preparations sheets, make-ready strips and crease-preparing devices being tools for use with stamping, punching, stripping and blanking tools and machines (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations) | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Measuring apparatus and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Goods of rubber, gutta-percha or gum being parts of stamping, punching, stripping and blanking tools and machines (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); materials for rubber coating of punching dies (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); adhesive tapes, strips, bands and films (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations) | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 11, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |