USPTO serial 79340669
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN EVANS
STEPHEN EVANS MARSHALL & MELHORN LLCFOUR SEAGATE 8TH FLOORTOLEDO, OH 43604UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable and recorded software and computer programs for providing audio conferencing, video conferencing, time management, sharing web-based documents, collaborating on shared documents; downloadable and recorded file sharing software; downloadable and recorded conference software; downloadable and recorded software for audio conferencing; downloadable and recorded video conference software; downloadable and recorded collaboration software platforms | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for audio conferencing, video conferencing, time management, sharing web-based documents, collaborating on shared documents; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for audio conferencing, video conferencing, time management, sharing web-based documents, collaborating on shared documents; providing temporary use of web-based software for audio conferencing, video conferencing, time management, sharing web-based documents, collaborating on shared documents; installation, maintenance, repair, updating of data processing computer programmes and computer software for audio conferencing, video conferencing, time management, sharing web-based documents, collaborating on shared documents; technical support services relating to computer software and applications, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems related to audio conferencing, video conferencing, time management, sharing web-based documents, collaborating on shared documents | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2022 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |