USPTO serial 79340779
IGNITE PROCUREMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IGNITE PROCUREMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software platforms for purchasing and procurement; purchasing and procurement software; software for cloud based data processing; software for managing contracts and management and administration of suppliers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Consultancy and advisory services in the field of business strategy related to purchasing and procurement; procurement of contracts for the purchase and sale of goods and services; business advisory and consultancy services relating to the purchasing of goods and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of software and software-as-a-service (saas) for purchasing and procurement; software as a service services for purchasing and procurement; software-as-a-service (saas) for purchasing and procurement; cloud computing services; software services [saas] for purchasing and procurement, contract management, management of data and information and management and administration of suppliers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |