USPTO serial 79341272
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas Coleman
Nicholas Coleman Dickinson Wright, PLLC300 West Vine Street, Suite 1700Lexington, KY 40507UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | buttermilk biscuits being cookies; biscuits being cookies; cookies; buttermilk pancakes; chocolate-based beverages with milk; chocolate beverages with milk; cocoa beverages with milk; coffee-based beverages containing milk; coffee beverages with milk; gruel, with a milk base, for food; ice milk; ice milk bars; milk chocolate; milk jam; milk tea, non-milk based; milk tea [tea-based]; tea-based milk tea; tea beverages with milk; probiotic chocolate-based snack bars; probiotic cocoa-based snack bars; probiotic coffee-based snack bars; butter biscuits being cookies; butter cookies; butterscotch; butterscotch candies; butterscotch chips; butterscotch confectionery; butterscotch sweets; flavorings, other than essential oils, for butter; flavourings, other than essential oils, for butter; peanut butter biscuits being cookies; peanut butter chips [confectionery]; peanut butter confectionery chips; peanut butter cookies; dairy ice cream; ice cream; ice-cream cakes; ice cream cones; ice cream sundaes; ice cream wafers; non-dairy ice cream; sauces for ice cream; soft-serve ice cream | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |