USPTO serial 79341702
NOW NETWORK ORIENTED WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEETE, KYLE C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOW NETWORK ORIENTED WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer graphics software; application processors; mobile apps; web application software; computer software applications, downloadable; application development software; computer application software; business software; editing software; scheduling software; business management software; graphic art software; optimisation software; inventory software; decision-making software; logistics software; production support software; document management software; cad-cam software; search marketing software; cloud servers; cloud server software; training software; middleware; computer hardware; none of the aforesaid in relation to entertainment, on-demand television services, telecommunications, broadcasting, broadband and mobile and fixed line telephony services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Programming of multimedia applications; installation of computer software; software creation; updating of computer software; computer software design; product quality evaluation; development of computer programs recorded on data media (software) designed for use in construction and automated manufacturing (cad/cam); technological consultancy; engineering consultancy services; consultation services relating to interior design; professional consultancy relating to technology; computer engineering consultancy services; scientific and technological design; cloud computing; cloud hosting provider services; textile design services; design of computer hardware; design and development of computer hardware; maintenance of websites; creating and maintaining web sites for others; none of the aforesaid in relation to entertainment, on-demand television services, telecommunications, broadcasting, broadband and mobile and fixed line telephony services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |