Drawing for X SWARM TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79341769

X SWARM TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSGOOD, KRYSTINA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - AWAITING RESPONSE DOCKET

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X SWARM TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thilo C. Agthe

Thilo C. Agthe WUERSCH & GERING LLP88 Pine Street, 20th FloorNew York, NY 10005United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Moving and handling equipment, namely, moving and handling equipment for loading, moving and unloading for industrial and/or logistical purposes; robotic handling apparatus, namely, robotic handling apparatus for industrial and/or logistical purposes; robotic apparatus for handling materials, namely, robotic material handling apparatus for industrial and/or logistical purposes; control mechanisms for robotic machines, namely, control mechanisms for robotic machines for industrial and/or logistical purposes; self-driving robots for industrial use, namely for indoor and outdoor use; automated robotic handling apparatus, namely automated robotic handling robots for industrial and/or logistical purposes for loading and unloading of goods; dispensing machines, namely, machines for dispensing packing material or expendable materials and goodsACTIVE—
009Recorded computer software for steering, guiding, controlling and monitoring driverless autonomous vehicles for industrial and logistic purposesACTIVE—
012Land vehicles and conveyances, namely, driverless transport systems for vehicles comprised primarily of automatically guided driverless material handling tractors and lift trucks; driverless transporters comprised primarily of automatically guided driverless vehicles in the nature of material handling tractors and lift trucks, boats, barges and rail cars for transport by land, water or railACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 20, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 21, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 17, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 10, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 27, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 31, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 11, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 10, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 15, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2022LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance