Drawing for STARK

USPTO serial 79341894

STARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas B. Kern

Thomas B. Kern Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP41 South High Street, Suite 2600Columbus, OH 43215-6164United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012MotorcyclesACTIVE—
035Retail store services featuring motorcyclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 30, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 28, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 27, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 23, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 2, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 20, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 14, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 13, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 3, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance