USPTO serial 79342090
RM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALCIDO, JOHN CHARLES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Milling machines; milling-drilling machines; slitting machines for industrial use; blanking presses; plasma cutting machines; machine tools for cutting; plywood clipping machines; cutting tips being parts of machines; plate shearing machines; metal cutting machines; stone cutting machines; cutting devices for raise boring; cutting guides for use with electric machines; fibre cutting machines; cutting devices that are parts of machines; lumbering band saws; cutting discs for use as parts of machines; robotic electric arc cutting apparatus; precision machine tools for cutting workpieces; pantograph controlled machines for engraving; laser welding devices; laser welding machines; laser engraving machines; laser engraving machines for woodworking; laser drilling machines for stoneworking; plasma etching machines; plasma welding machines; wire welding machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation and repair services; repair and maintenance of milling machines; providing information related to repair or maintenance of milling machines; installation of milling machines; maintenance, service, set-up and repair of milling machines; repair and maintenance of slitting machines; providing information related to repair or maintenance of slitting machines; installation of slitting machines; maintenance, servicing, setting up and repair of slitting machines; repair and maintenance of engraving machines; providing information relating to the repair or maintenance of engraving machines; installation of engraving machines; maintenance, servicing, setting up and repair of engraving machines; maintenance and repair of gears; repair and maintenance of laser measuring apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2024 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |