USPTO serial 79342884
UNCLEBOB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNCLEBOB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail services relating to food; retail services in relation to foodstuffs; retail services in relation to alcoholic beverages (except beer); retail services in relation to dairy products; retail services relating to candy; unmanned retail store services relating to food; unmanned retail store services relating to drink; on-line ordering services in the field of restaurant take-out and delivery; online ordering services; retail services relating to bakery products; retail services in relation to beer; retail services in relation to meats; retail services in relation to teas; retail services in relation to coffee; retail services in relation to cocoa; retail services in relation to non-alcoholic beverages; retail services in relation to chocolate; retail services in relation to desserts; retail services in relation to confectionery; retail services relating to fruit; retail services relating to alcoholic beverages; advertising, including on-line advertising on a computer network; publicity and sales promotion services; advertising; online advertisements (term considered linguistically incorrect by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); promotion [advertising] of business | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Preparation of meals; preparation and provision of food and drink for immediate consumption; food preparation for others on an outsourcing basis; take-away food and drink services; take-away food services; food preparation services; take-out restaurant services; services for providing food; services for providing drink; services for the preparation of food and drink | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2024 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |