USPTO serial 79342911
SERENDATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SERENDATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software; computer software; mobile application software; mobile apps; computer software for managing change activities; computer software for business management; downloadable applications for use with mobile devices; downloadable software applications for provision of business management information | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management; business administration services; business management consulting; database management services; computerised database management services; data processing services; business data analysis; advisory services relating to organisational change processes; providing business information via a web site or software application; business intelligence; collection and systematization of information into electronic databases | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of computer databases; hosting of websites; hosting of software applications; design of computer software; development of computer software; hosting of databases; online provision of web-based applications (non-downloadable); non-downloadable software (software as a service); non-downloadable software (software as a service) in relation to organisation management, management of change processes, and data analytics services; information technology consultancy services; information, advisory and consultancy services in relation to the aforementioned | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2024 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 1, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |