USPTO serial 79344566
OK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PURATH, ANICKA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hairdressing scissors for personal use; razor blades; razors; shaving tools; hand tools, electric and non-electric hair-removal apparatus; cutting blades | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2023 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 5, 2023 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 27, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |