USPTO serial 79345105
AMPLUG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BANSAL, MEGHA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 305- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMPLUG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Tokyo 168-0073, JP
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Guitar amplifiers; bass amplifiers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |