USPTO serial 79345892
BARLINEK NEXT STEP WATERPROOF HYBRID FLOORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAGLINI, KAREN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BARLINEK NEXT STEP WATERPROOF HYBRID FLOORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Wood joints; construction plastic systems for mounting planks and wooden components; construction fixings, connectors, joints and holders for mounting and connecting boards and elements of wood; construction fasteners for boards and elements of wood; expansion joints of non-metallic materials for use in construction; milled joints in wooden panels and boards with a plastic element for laying floorboards in a traditional herringbone pattern without using the right and left woodblocks; floors, not of metal; wooden flooring; planks; parquet floor boards; duckboards, not of metal; floor boards, adhesive and non-adhesive; floor panels; parquet flooring, mosaics; floor tiles, not of metal; parquet floor boards; skirting; hybrid flooring with an external wooden layer and core including stone powder and pcv resin; pcv floors; hybrid flooring with an external wooden layer and core including stone powder and resin; rigid core floorings, resistant to water and high temperature fluctuations, made of minerals combined with a polymer; laminated parquet flooring; floating floors; rubber flooring; artificial wood flooring; plinths; sawn timber for floors; terrace boards; wooden components for decking and balconies; timber (sawn-), dressed timber, manufactured timber, veneer wood, building timber, building timber, worked timber; staircases, not of metal; wooden staircases; banisters; balustrading; handrails; wood veneers; veneer wood; wooden wainscoting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |