USPTO serial 79345951
UFL FAIR TO PLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UFL FAIR TO PLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Games software; computer games; interactive game software; video game software; video game programs; electronic game programs; computer games programs [software]; virtual reality game software; downloadable game related software applications; video games on disc [computer software]; electronic game software for mobile phones; electronic game software for handheld electronic devices; computer games programs downloaded via the internet [software]; games software for use with computers; computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; games software for use with video game consoles; recorded content; downloadable media; downloadable electronic publications; downloadable image files; downloadable music files; downloadable video files; cases for smartphones; cases for tablet computers; mouse pads; loudspeakers; usb flash drives | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services; game services; interactive computer game services; online computer game services; online game services through mobile devices; video game entertainment services; provision of online computer games; electronic games services; providing online video games; games equipment rental; multimedia publishing relating to interactive computer and video game software; organization of sports competitions; organization of e-sports competitions; organization of entertainment competitions; game shows; provision of online tutorials; educational and training services relating to games; production of videos; information relating to computer gaming entertainment provided online from a computer database or a global communication network; providing online electronic publications, not downloadable; providing online videos, not downloadable | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |