Drawing for TWENTYFOURSEVEN

USPTO serial 79346106

TWENTYFOURSEVEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRASS, KRISTINA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWENTYFOURSEVEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBYN S. LEDERMAN

1000 TOWN CENTER, 22ND FLOORSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail and wholesale store services featuring perfumery, fashion goods, wearing apparel and footwear, headgear, belts, scarves, bags, purses and wallets, jewelry, spectacles and accessories to all those; Business operation and management of shops, chain of shops, shopping centers, and malls for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2025IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Dec 9, 2025IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 23, 2025FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2025FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2024MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 22, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 21, 2024ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 7, 2024EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 22, 2024RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Mar 22, 2024RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2024CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2024EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 23, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 23, 2024EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 20, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2024ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2024RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Jan 12, 2024RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2024RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jan 8, 2024DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 5, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 3, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2023DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2023ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 24, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 3, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 29, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance