Drawing for MAG WAAP

USPTO serial 79346191

MAG WAAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
I, DAVID C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAG WAAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perla M. Kuhn

Perla M. Kuhn Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox Drive, Building 3Princeton Pike Corporate CenterLawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Turbo blowers, namely, power operated blowers; blowers, namely, axial flow blowers, forge blowers, snow blowers, centrifugal blower, mixed-flow blower; rotary blowers; blowing machines, namely, fiber blowing machines, blowing machines for the compression, sucking and carrying of grai, blowing machines for aeration; gas turbines, not for land vehicles; gas turbine engines, not for land vehicles; steam engine boilers for power generation, other than for land vehicles; steam generator for heat supply; electric power generators for cogeneration systemsACTIVE—
009Electric control panels; electronic control apparatus for cogeneration systems, namely, electronic apparatus for the remote or local control of industrial operations; electronic control apparatus for blowers, namely, electronic control apparatus for the remote control of axial flow blowers, forge blowers, snow blowers, centrifugal blower, mixed-flow blower; electronic control apparatus for sludge drying systems for effective utilization of sewage sludge as biomass energy source; electric control apparatus for energy management, namely, wireless or wired controllers to remotely monitor and control; recorded computer programs on electric control apparatus for energy management, namely, optimal control system of power consumption; power distribution or control machines and apparatus, namely, electrical power distribution units, electric power distribution machines, electrical distribution systems, namely, power distribution panels; rotary converters; phase modifiers; electronic control systems for machinesACTIVE—
011Boilers, other than parts of non-electric prime movers or engines namely, electric boilers, industrial boilers, furnace boilers; sludge dryer, namely, sludge dewatering and drying systems for effective utilization of sewage sludge as biomass energy sourceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 20, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 11, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 29, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 22, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 3, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 8, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 11, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 10, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 29, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance