USPTO serial 79346275
BROW TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HISER, CHARLES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BROW TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software; application software; downloadable electronic publications; media content; downloadable videos; audio books; video recordings; audio recordings; downloadable educational course materials; training manuals in electronic format; downloadable educational media; podcasts; videocasts; publications in electronic format | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training and education services; production of training videos; instruction via broadcasting; arranging and conducting of conferences, seminars, exhibitions and competitions; providing online non-downloadable video and audio content; provision of online electronic publications [not downloadable]; creation [writing] of educational content for podcasts; audio and video recording services; audio and video editing; video production; provision of video recording studio services; digital video, audio and multimedia entertainment publishing services; video library services; video entertainment services; hosting [organising] awards relating to videos; audio, video and multimedia production; providing not downloadable training and entertainment videos via video-on-demand services; electronic library services for the supply of electronic information in the form of text, audio and/or video information; production of videos for corporate use in educational training; video recordings [non downloadable] provided from the internet; online digital publishing services; entertainment and educational services featuring electronic media, multimedia content, videos, movies, pictures, images, text, photos, games, user-generated content, audio content, and related information; online publication of electronic books and journals; providing online journals, namely, blogs featuring information on the subject of user-generated website content; publication of multimedia material online; online interactive entertainment and training; information, advice and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |