USPTO serial 79346469
NIDEC ARISA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS,KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NIDEC ARISA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools and mechanical tools; presses [machines for industrial purposes]; industrial machine presses; robotic presses for metalworking; die-stamping machines; cutting dies for use with machines; feeding machines for presses; linear transfer machines; electric shears; mechanical shears [machines]; grease boxes [parts of machines] | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of machines; maintenance and repair of presses for processing metals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, as well as research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis, industrial research and industrial design services; quality control and authentication services; computer hardware and software design and development; engineering services for the analysis of structures; engineering services for machinery analysis; engineering services for structural design; engineering services for machinery design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 16, 2022 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 13, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 12, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |