Drawing for OCTOPLANT

USPTO serial 79346783

OCTOPLANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SIRIGNANO, EMMA MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OCTOPLANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main StKaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software; mobile apps; data and file management and database software; measuring, detecting, monitoring and controlling devices; data processing equipment and accessories [electrical and mechanical]; computer networking and data communications equipmentACTIVE—
041Teaching; training; provision of training and further training; arranging and conducting of conferences, seminars, workshops, exhibitions and competitions; publication of printed matterACTIVE—
042Software development, programming and implementation; computer hardware development; data security services; data security consultancy; hosting services, software as a service, and rental of software; IT consultancy, advisory and information services; IT security services in the nature of protection and recovery of computer dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 31, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 5, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 4, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 3, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 13, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 1, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 30, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 24, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 23, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 5, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance