USPTO serial 79347150
ONE-GARDEN PRINCIPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONE-GARDEN PRINCIPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Commercial project management services for others for commercial purposes in the field of environmental project development and assessment and guidance regarding investments in environmental projects; commercial business management; commercial intermediary services in the framework of bringing prospective private investors in contact with entrepreneurs looking for financing; commercial consultant services with respect to company acquisition | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial affairs, particularly financial information, management and analysis services; providing advice and financial consultant services; capital investment, particularly in the field of renewable energies and sustainable development projects; establishing funds and other investments, particularly, establishing mutual funds for others; fund management, particularly, hedge fund management, venture capital fund management and private investment fund management; investment consultant services; investment management and financial asset management; management of funds, particularly of funds in the field of the environment; financial investment brokerage, particularly arranging of financial investments | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Quality control for others; data extraction services; computer-aided scientific analysis services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |