USPTO serial 79347231
MTCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'NEILL, MARY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MTCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
Thomas J. Moore Bacon & Thomas, PLLC201 N. Union Street, Suite 320Alexandria, VA 22314-2650UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | interface devices being machine parts for use with robots with mechanical, pneumatic, negative pressure based, hydraulic, magnetic, electric and/or electromagnetic coupling equipment for releasable connection of hand-held modules, gripping modules, tool modules or random effectors on robots; quick changing devices for releasable connection of hand-held modules, gripping modules, tool modules or random effectors on robots; component and replacement parts of the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | hand-operated tools, namely, manually operated interface devices for use with robots with mechanical, pneumatic, negative pressure based, hydraulic, magnetic, electric and/or electromagnetic coupling equipment for manually releasable connection of hand- held modules, gripping modules, tool modules or random effectors on robots; manually operated quick changing devices being hand-operated tools for releasable connection of hand-held modules, gripping modules, tool modules or random effectors on robots | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | electronic control devices for operating conveyor apparatus, handling apparatus, lifting apparatus, mechanically operated clutching device including suction grabs or magnetic grabs or clamping grabs, tube lifters, clamping devices for fixing workpieces, negative pressure generators and ejector siphon pumps, fuel cells or batteries, the aforesaid electronic control and regulating devices, including being remote controls; electronic control devices for operating conveyor apparatus, handling apparatus, lifting apparatus, mechanically operated clutching device including suction grabs or magnetic grabs or clamping grabs, tube lifters, clamping devices for fixing workpieces, negative pressure generators and ejector siphon pumps, fuel cells or batteries, the aforesaid electronic control and regulating devices, including being remote controls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |