USPTO serial 79347564
FIRPOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIRPOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Eau de Cologne; eaux de toilette; bath foams; after-shave balms; hair conditioners; balms for the skin; incense sticks; after-shave eau de cologne; cosmetics and cosmetic products; cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; skin cleansing creams other than for medical use; moisturizing after-shave creams; lip cream; suntan creams; cosmetic care creams; cosmetic creams; bath creams; day creams; night cream; cleansing creams [cosmetics]; beauty creams; after-shave creams; sun-tanning creams and lotions; creams and lotions for cosmetic use; foundation cream; moisturizing creams; face and body creams; perfumed creams (for cosmetic use); sunblock creams; dentifrices; body deodorants [cosmetics]; hand-cleaning products; cosmetic disks; eau de parfum; shower foams; after-shave emulsions; body emulsions; exfoliants; blusher for cheeks; make-up foundations; fragrances; bath and shower gels; moisturizing gels [cosmetics]; hair sprays; cleansing milk for toilet purposes; beauty milks; after-shave milks; moisturizing milks; bath lotions; beard lotions; lotions for cosmetic use; lip gloss; mascara; beauty masks; oils for cosmetic use; oils for toilet purposes; cosmetic skin-tanning preparations; cosmetic and beauty preparations; perfumery products; perfumes; lipstick; wipes impregnated with make-up removing preparations; beauty soaps; bath soaps; shaving soaps; liquid soaps; cakes of toilet soap; cosmetic body scrubs; shampoos; beauty serums; nail polish; talcum powder for toilet use; toners for cosmetic use; make-up | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |