Drawing for GLANDY

USPTO serial 79347684

GLANDY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 405
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUROK, GALINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLANDY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Corey K. Cho

Corey K. Cho Saliwanchik, Lloyd & Eisenschenk, P.A.3107 SW Williston RdGainesville, FL 32608UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Telemedicine services; medical analysis for the diagnosis and treatment of persons; provision of health information; providing health information via a website; medical information; medical information services provided via the Internet; providing information to patients in the field of administering medications; medical analysis services relating to the treatment of patients; advisory services relating to health; advisory services relating to health careSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2023TRPTREQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION PROCESSED - TOTAL—
Nov 8, 2023ERFTTEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 1, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 26, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 8, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 25, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 24, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 19, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance