USPTO serial 79348649
DELO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DELO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Information technology and audio-visual, multimedia and photographic devices; computer networking and data communications equipment; peripherals adapted for use with computers; communication hubs; network hubs; magnetic data carriers; computer software and hardware; data processing equipment/apparatus and computers; data media; computer programs (downloadable computer software); computer programs, recorded; intercommunication apparatus; readers (data processing equipment); conference software; graphic terminals; interactive terminals; application software; computer network adapters | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Software development, programming and implementation; design and development of computer hardware and software; support and maintenance services for computer software; technical support services relating to computer networks; provision of on-line support services for computer program users; installation, setting up, repair, updating and maintenance of computer software; computer software consultancy; computer systems integration services; consultancy in the field of office and workplace automation; custom design and development of office automation equipment; custom design and development of software packages; rental of computer hardware and computer software; services for maintenance of computer software; software as a service (saas) services featuring software for use in office planning and workplace management; software as a service (saas) services featuring software for use in calendaring, booking, organizing, and conducting meetings; software as a service (saas) services featuring software for use in displaying calendaring information on television, tablet, computer, smartphone, and smartwatch screens; software as a service (saas) services featuring software for application and database integration and connecting computer network users | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 8, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |