USPTO serial 79349136
PRIVATE POWER HUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRIVATE POWER HUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs; application software; telecommunication machines and apparatus; smartphones; electrical communication machines and instruments; measuring or testing machines and instruments; sensors; radio beacon machines and apparatus; electronic publications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; providing computer programs on data networks; providing computer programs available on the internet; software as a service (SaaS); cloud computing; hosting computer sites (web sites); platform as a service (PaaS); providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a web site; information technology (IT) consulting services; computer technology consultancy; scientific research; installation of computer programs; consultancy relating to installation of computer programs; installation of computer programs into computer systems; consultancy and advisory services relating to installation of computer programs into computer systems; design, planning or maintenance of communication network systems; consultancy relating to design of computer and computer programs; design and development of information process systems; consultancy relating to software design and maintenance of information process systems; design, development, programming or maintenance of computer systems; consultancy relating to design, development, programming or maintenance of computer systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 4, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |