USPTO serial 79349177
DIVA NAIL TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, HYUN-JUNG
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIVA NAIL TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Lacquer-removing preparations; nail varnish removers; nail varnish; oils for cleaning purposes; nail art stickers; false nails; sandcloth; glass cloth [abrasive cloth]; polishing preparations; nail care preparations; nail varnish and gel nail polish; nail buffing preparations; lacquer-removing and gel nail polish-removing preparations; nail varnish and gel nail polish removers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Promoting the sale of goods, namely, lacquer-removing preparations, nail varnish removers, nail varnish, oils for cleaning purposes, nail art stickers, false nails, sandcloth, glass cloth [abrasive cloth], polishing preparations, nail care preparations, nail varnish and gel nail polish, nail buffing preparations, lacquer-removing and gel nail polish-removing preparations, nail varnish and gel nail polish removers | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Beauty salon services; manicuring | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 11, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |