Drawing for VERSATECH

USPTO serial 79349254

VERSATECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANCA, ALBERTO I
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VERSATECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Greger

Jeffrey H. Greger Hauptman Ham, LLP2318 MILL RD.SUITE 1400Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial packaging and wrapping machines for packaging and wrapping food and beverages; Industrial Packaging and wrapping machines, namely industrial robotic assembly-line machines used in the food and beverage industry for blending and dosing foods and beverages and filling, sealing, and crimping of packaging such as jars, bottles, boxes, bags and pouches; industrial blending machines for the food and beverage industry; industrial cup filling machines and mixing machines equipped with a dosing devices; Industrial packaging and wrapping machines for packing goods into crates; Industrial packaging and wrapping machines for making cartons for boxing product; and Industrial packaging and wrapping machines for wrapping products with cellophaneACTIVE—
037Assembly, installation and maintenance of industrial packaging machinesACTIVE—
042Professional consultations in the field of designing product packaging materials, namely, development and integration of industrial packaging lines; engineers' services being engineering services, namely, the design and development of industrial packaging machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2025FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2025FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2025FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 22, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 9, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 3, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 16, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 14, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 14, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 24, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 7, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 22, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 21, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 9, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance