USPTO serial 79349676
CYBERSCAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBERSCAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Media software, recorded and downloadable; electronic publications recorded on computer media; electronic (downloadable) publications available from databases or the Internet; software; application software | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Preparation of commercial statistics; establishing statistics; compilation of statistics for business or commercial purposes; compilation of company statistics and commercial information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Information technology services; advice regarding information technology; provision of advice and development services relating to software; research in the field of software; research in the field of computer technology conducted using databases and the Internet; research in the field of information technology; provision of technical information relating to computers, software and computer networks; consultancy and information services relating to the design, programming and maintenance of software; design, development and programming of software; software development services; development, programming and implementation of software; maintenance and updating of software; software as a service (SaaS); design, updating and rental of software; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software applications accessible via a website; computer programming services for commercial documentation and analysis; software customization; cloud computing; computer platform as a service (PaaS); infrastructure as a service (iaas) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |