Drawing for DAEKKO

USPTO serial 79349772

DAEKKO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARMON, RAYMOND E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DAEKKO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Road rollers; steamrollers; whitewashing machines; beating machines; concrete mixers; bitumen making machines; bulldozers; mechanical shovels; disintegrators; excavating machines; tarring machines; mixing machines; stone-working machines; rail-laying machines; road building machines; railroad constructing machines; earth moving machines, namely, excavators; rammers being machines; ploughs; earth moving machines; crushing machines; rammers [machines]; apparatus for machining; swaging machines; stamping presses; die-stamping machines; hammers; power hammers; air hammers; tilt hammers; metalworking machines; punches for punching machines; punching machines; punching presses for metalworking; trueing machines; electric hammers; agitators; mixing machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2025FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 30, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 21, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 28, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 28, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 10, 2023RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 16, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 5, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 4, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 26, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2022LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance