USPTO serial 79350153
CO2HUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CO2HUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacy J. Grossman
Stacy J. Grossman Law Office of Stacy J. Grossman PLLC500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 320Harrison, NY 10528UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer programs for enabling communication between computer networks in the field of the internet of things (IoT); electronic publications, namely, manuals in the field of the internet of internet of things (IoT) recorded on computer media, all of the aforementioned goods not for use in the field of digital coaching and elearning | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; providing computer programs on data networks, namely, providing online non- downloadable computer software programs for enabling communication between computer networks in the field of the internet of things (IoT); providing computer programs available on the internet, namely, providing online non-downloadable computer software programs for enabling communication between computer networks in the field of the internet of things (IoT); software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for enabling communication between computer networks in the field of the internet of things (IoT); cloud computing featuring software for enabling communication between computer networks in the field of the internet of things (IoT); hosting computer websites; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software for enabling communication between computer networks in the field of the internet of things (IoT); providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a web site; information technology (IT) consulting services; computer technology consultancy; installation of computer programs; consultancy relating to installation of computer programs; installation of computer programs into computer systems; consultancy and advisory services relating to installation of computer programs into computer systems; consultancy relating to design of computer and computer programs; design and development of information process systems; consultancy relating to software design and maintenance of software for information process systems; design, development, and programming of computer systems, and maintenance of computer system software; consultancy relating to design, development, and programming of computer systems, and of maintenance of computer system software, all of the aforementioned services not for use in the field of digital coaching and elearning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jul 16, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2023 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 17, 2023 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 4, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |