USPTO serial 79350267
ALGAENERGY INNOVATION WITH PURPOSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUDSON, TAMARA BREE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALGAENERGY INNOVATION WITH PURPOSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Scientific and technological services in the field of the production of micro-algae for the production of biofuels; research services in the field of the production of micro algae for application in pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, cosmetics products and feed products for animals; research in the field of environmental protection through the use of micro-algae; research services for the genetic selection and improvement of micro-algae and cyanobacteria for the production of biodiesel; research in the field of environmental protection via biofixation in microalgal cultivations of CO2 existing in the exhaust gases from industry and transformation of the noxious gas into business interest products; research and development of new products for others proceeding from the selection of those microalgae whose biochemical composition is useful for obtaining lactic acid and the development of a strategy to utilize algal residue coming from lipid separation processes for biofuel production; research services for the development of new catalytic systems for high interest processes involving a significant technological advance enabling second generation biofuels to be obtained from products relating to one of research lines in the field of micro-algae, attempting to obtain new products and/or applications in the field; Services of photobioreactor control testing systems for efficiently managing the production of biomass from micro-algae cultivation; engineering services; bacteriological, biological and cosmetology research services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |