USPTO serial 79350665
WEBEXPENSES AN ELMO COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEBEXPENSES AN ELMO COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable expense management software; downloadable software applications for mobile phones and handheld computers for claiming, tracking, approving, reimbursing and reporting business expenses; downloadable computer application software for mobile phones and handheld computers, namely, software which enables users to perform scanning and character recognition for accounting, bookkeeping, tax preparation, transaction processing, transaction management, business process management, and financial planning | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Cloud computing services in the field of expense management; cloud computing services featuring software to tracking, approving, reimbursing and reporting business expenses; providing contracted on-line non-downloadable computer software for expense management services using cloud-based software technology; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for expense management; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for tracking, approving, reimbursing and reporting business expenses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |