USPTO serial 79351844
HIVEON ID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OESTREICHER, SALIMA PARMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIVEON ID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software recorded; computer game software downloadable; computer game software recorded; computer programs downloadable; computer programs recorded; computer operating programs recorded; computer software applications downloadable; computer software platforms, recorded or downloadable; monitors [computer programs] | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer system analysis; recovery of computer data; off-site data backup; duplication of computer programs; electronic data storage; providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a website; installation of computer software; information technology services provided on an outsourcing basis; computer programming; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion; computer technology consultancy; telecommunications technology consultancy; information technology [IT] consultancy; computer software consultancy; computer security consultancy; website design consultancy; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; platform as a service [PaaS]; hosting computer web sites; data encryption services; computer virus protection services; software as a service [SaaS]; computer system design; computer software design; rental of computer software; development of computer platforms; software development in the framework of software publishing; creating and maintaining websites for others; creating and designing website-based indexes of information for others [information technology services]; rental of web servers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |