Drawing for PAN DE MANILA

USPTO serial 79352378

PAN DE MANILA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PAN DE MANILA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Jams; jellies; almond spreads; cheese spreads; fruit spreads; hazelnut spreads; lemon spread; squash spread; cream cheese spreads; dairy-based spreads; egg-based spreads; fruit-based spreads; garlic-based spreads; meat-based spreads; nut-based spreads; peanut-based spreads; vegetable-based spreads; cheese spreads; cream cheese spreads; dairy-based spreads; egg-based spreads; fish and seafood spreads; fruit-based spreads; fruit jelly spreads; garlic-based spreads; peanut-based spreads; vegetable-based spreads; spreads made from vegetable oils; non-dairy spreads; milk beverages, milk predominating; canned meat or fish; tinned meat or fish; meat, fish, poultry and game; canned sardines; tinned sardines; bottled cooked meat; bottled fish; cheeseACTIVE—
030Baked goods; breads; pastries; condiments; chocolate-based spreads; cocoa spreads; maple spreads; coffee beverages; chocolate-based beverages; cocoa-based beveragesACTIVE—
035Retail services for baked goods; wholesale services for baked goodsACTIVE—
043Restaurant services; bar and restaurant services; café and restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 19, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 19, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 11, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 10, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 25, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2022LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance