Drawing for FIT E-BIKE SYSTEM INTEGRATION

USPTO serial 79352761

FIT E-BIKE SYSTEM INTEGRATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANCA, ALBERTO I
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIT E-BIKE SYSTEM INTEGRATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew J. Sorosiak

Matthew J. Sorosiak MacMillan, Sobanski & Todd, LLC720 Water StreetOne Maritime Plaza, 5th FloorToledo, OH 43604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009chargers for electric batteries for electric bicycles; battery boxes for batteries for electric bicycles; batteries, electric, for electric bicycles; batteries for electric bicycles; battery starter cables for electric bicycles; electric batteries for powering electric bicycles; battery charge devices for batteries for electric bicycles; battery cases for batteries for electric bicycles; accumulators, namely, batteries for electric bicycles; battery cables for electric bicycle batteries; monitoring devices for monitoring battery performance characteristics of electric bicycles; electronic display interfaces for use with electric bicycles; electric bicycle mountable display monitors for providing electric bicycle riders with navigational and operational information; mounting devices for monitors for electric bicycles; vehicle safety equipment, namely, electronic tire pressure monitors for electric bicycles tires; parts for anti-theft electric bicycle alarms, namely, electronic sensors, remote control transmitters and receivers for remotely operating electric bicycles; electric locks for electric bicycles; head-up displays (HUDs), namely, fixed and helmet mounted transparent electronic displays for providing electric bicycle riders with navigational and operational information; electronic controls for electric engines for electric bicycles; simulators for driving or control of electric bicycles; downloadable computer utility programs for performing electric bicycle maintenance; recorded computer utility programs for performing electric bicycle maintenance; electronic power supplies for driving electric motors of electric bicycles; electronic apparatus and instruments for controlling, adjusting and testing of drives and motors for electric bicyclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 18, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 5, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 9, 2025CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 17, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 16, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 1, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 7, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 6, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 27, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2022LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2022SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance