USPTO serial 79354581
LE CHIPSIER FRANCAIS BRETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LE CHIPSIER FRANCAIS BRETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved, dried, cooked and dehydrated fruits and vegetables; chips (potatoes); potato-based food preparations; appetizers, namely, soy-based snacks, vegetable-based snacks, meat-based snacks, potato-based snacks; fruit- or pulse-based appetizers; snacks based on pulses; pulse-based reconstituted crisps; all these goods are of French origin or made in France | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Cereal preparations; biscuits and cookies; appetizers, namely, sesame-based snacks, rice-based snacks, corn-based snacks, wheat-based snacks; cereal-based snacks; tortilla wrap-based snacks; flour-based savory snacks; crisp bread-based snack food; puffed corn-based snacks; extruded wheat-based snacks; extruded corn-based snacks; snack foods consisting principally of extruded cereals; corn-based, ready-to-eat, savory snacks made by extrusion; cereal flour-based reconstituted crisps, pulse-based biscuits for puffed or extruded appetizers, all these goods are of French origin or made in France | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2023 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 19, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 18, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |