USPTO serial 79354733
LA CORRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LA CORRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Beans, preserved; soya beans, preserved, for food; broth; ginger jam; peas, preserved; mushrooms, preserved; jellies for food; fruit jelly spreads; caviar; sauerkraut; vegetables, tinned; fruits, tinned; gherkins; onions, preserved; marmalade; fruit pulp; vegetables, preserved; vegetables, dried; vegetables, cooked; potato fritters; olives, preserved; tomato paste; pickles; jams; cranberry compote; apple purée; vegetable salads; fruit salads; processed seaweed salads; tomato juice for cooking; vegetable juices for cooking; preparations for making bouillon; preparations for making soup; soups; vegetable soup preparations; laver, preserved; truffles, preserved; dates; crystallized fruits; frozen fruits; fruit, preserved; fruit preserved in alcohol; fruit, stewed; potato flakes; fruit peel; lentils, preserved; potato crisps; fruit chips; seaweed chips; seaweed extracts for food | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Mustard; dressings for salad; capers; couscous; condiments; sauces; vinegar; garden herbs, preserved; piccalilli | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |