USPTO serial 79355097
COMMEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMMEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Security surveillance apparatus; electric and electronic security apparatus and instruments; computer hardware; computer software; computer peripheral devices; direct intercoms, apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, repair, maintenance, breakdown services, in relation to the following fields: security systems, video systems, intercom systems; information services relating to installation of security systems, information relating to the installation of video transmission and intercom systems; computer hardware installation and maintenance services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services; provision and rental of telecommunications facilities and equipment; information about telecommunication; consultancy in the field of telecommunications; providing access to telecommunication networks; transfer of data by telecommunications; interactive telecommunications services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Installation and maintenance of computer programs; technological services; industrial research; industrial process research; software design and development; design and development of computer hardware; IT security, protection and restoration; telecommunication network security consultancy; quality control; conducting technical project studies; engineering project management services; civil engineering planning services; rental of computer hardware and computer software; software as a service [SaaS] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 7, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |