USPTO serial 79355551
RED BALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RED BALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable emoticons for mobile phones; computer software, recorded for video games; computer software applications, downloadable for video games; computer screen saver software, recorded or downloadable; computer programs, recorded for video games; computer game software, downloadable; computer game software, recorded; computer programs, downloadable for video games; computer operating programs, recorded; electronic publications, downloadable in the nature of magazines in the field of gaming; audiovisual teaching apparatus in the nature of computer monitors; downloadable ring tones for mobile phones; downloadable image files containing video games characters; downloadable music files; video disks with recorded animated cartoons; downloadable graphics for mobile phones | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer system analysis; recovery of computer data; installation of computer software; web site design consultancy; computer security consultancy; information technology (IT) consultancy; computer technology consultancy; computer software consultancy; updating of computer software; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for design and development of video games; maintenance of computer software; providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a web site; platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring software for design and development of video games; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion; computer system design; rental of computer software; hosting computer sites in the nature of hosting web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; development of computer platforms; computer software design; creating and maintaining web sites for others; computer programming; technical writing; duplication of computer programs; outsource service providers in the field of information technology; electronic data storage | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |