USPTO serial 79355594
ALTISS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BARRETT, LEAH N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALTISS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Bio-based industrial chemical, ethylene glycol, monoethylene glycol (EG or MEG or bio-MEG), Propylene glycol, monopropylene glycol (PG or MPG or bio MPG), glycerol, bio-glycerol, to be used as components, raw materials in end products, which exclude end products in relation to animal nutrition | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research related to raw materials and ingredients consisting of bio-based industrial chemical, ethylene glycol, monoethylene glycol (EG or MEG or bio-MEG), Propylene glycol, monopropylene glycol (PG or MPG or bio-MPG), glycerol, bio-glycerol, to be used as components, raw materials in end products, which exclude end products in relation to animal nutrition; chemical laboratory services related to the aforementioned services, consulting relating to the aforesaid services; the aforesaid services also in connection with treatment of materials and provided for the bio-based polymer industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of intellectual property rights; licensing of technology; licensing of research and development; licensing of knowhow; licensing of patent applications; licensing of patents; licensing of trademarks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2023 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2023 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |